The North Gauteng High Court recently ruled on a significant matter related to the ongoing trial for the murder of Bafana Bafana captain Senzo Meyiwa. In a judgment handed down on 12 November 2024, Judge Jan Swanepoel addressed the issue of solitary confinement for two of the accused, Mthobisi Mncube and Fisokuhle Ntuli, who have been detained in the C-Max section of the Kgosi Mampuru II Correctional Facility in Pretoria since their arrest.
Solitary Confinement and Mental Health Concerns
Mncube and Ntuli have been held in solitary confinement for over four years, since the commencement of their trial in 2020. In their court application, the two men raised serious concerns regarding the impact of their prolonged isolation on their mental health. Mncube specifically highlighted his struggles with insomnia, severe stress, and a mental breakdown on 7 October 2024, as a direct result of the solitary confinement conditions. He reported being unable to concentrate, feeling hopeless, and unable to provide adequate instructions to his legal counsel due to his deteriorating mental state.
Among the complaints made in the application, Mncube described being confined to a cell for 22 hours a day with no human contact or access to any form of entertainment or intellectual stimulation such as books, radio, or television. Ntuli, meanwhile, shared similar concerns, noting that the mere thought of remaining in isolation caused him significant panic and anxiety, severely impacting his ability to sleep.
In response, the Department of Correctional Services (DCS) disputed the claims made by the two accused, arguing that they had never been placed in solitary confinement but had instead been held in individual cells. The DCS also maintained that the conditions at the Kgosi Mampuru II Correctional Facility complied with regulations, and that the cells were designed to provide adequate living conditions for detainees.
Court Ruling and the Department of Correctional Services’ Response
Judge Swanepoel’s ruling in favor of Mncube acknowledged the mental health concerns raised by the accused and the adverse effects of his continued detainment in the C-Max section. The judge ordered that Mncube be removed from solitary confinement and relocated to either his original detention centre or another suitable maximum-security facility that would allow for more appropriate living conditions.
However, the judge struck off the application by Ntuli, stating that there was no urgency to the matter, and therefore his request for a similar move was not addressed in this judgment.
Following the court’s decision, the Department of Correctional Services issued a statement acknowledging the judgment and reaffirming its respect for the judicial process. In the statement, the DCS confirmed that it was in the process of reviewing the judgment and assessing its implications for legal compliance and the department’s constitutional obligations.
“At this time, no further statements or comments will be provided until the review is complete,” the DCS said. “Once the review process is finalized, we will issue additional information on our intended course of action, if necessary.”
The Ongoing Trial
The trial of Mncube, Ntuli, and their three co-accused, who are facing charges in connection with the murder of Senzo Meyiwa in 2014, is ongoing. The five accused — Mncube, Ntuli, Muzikawukhulelwa Sibiya, Bongani Ntanzi, and Mthokoziseni Maphisa — are all facing charges that include murder, attempted murder, robbery with aggravating circumstances, possession of an unlicensed firearm, and possession of ammunition. All five men have pleaded not guilty to the charges.
The case has been closely followed by the public, with many eager for closure in a case that has been shrouded in controversy and uncertainty for nearly a decade. The murder of Senzo Meyiwa, a beloved footballer and national hero, remains one of South Africa’s most high-profile unsolved crimes.
As the trial progresses, further developments in the legal proceedings are expected, and the ruling on Mncube’s solitary confinement is a crucial moment in the broader case, underscoring the tension between maintaining security and ensuring the constitutional rights of detainees.



